25 July 2024
I
can see how truly rural charges are reluctant to unite with bigger town
charges. People fear three things.
Firstly, their Kirk Session will be swamped by the elders in the larger
charge. Secondly, the life of the newly
united charge will be centred on the
town church which has ‘so much going on’ as they say.
Thirdly,
the ministry will spend a larger proportion of their time in the town. More
people, of course, greater organisational life. In this, there will not be a
recognition that ministry in a rural charge is quite different from ministry in
a town charge.
There
are similar tasks – the conduct of worship, the ordinances of religion,
pastoral visiting. But there are several qualitative things which make it
different. In a rural charge, the kirk
and the community are inevitably closer and there is an expectation that the
minister will be seen and known across the community.
This
happens because in smaller communities there is more time to attend non-church
events and organisations and thereby get to know different people. Twice as
many people in our parishes as in our congregations align themselves to the
Kirk. They represent a significant hidden resource and support.
Additionally,
all age events are often better attended in the rural environment. It always
surprised me how comfortable children, teenagers and young parents felt
participating with older people in community events. This extended into the life of the
church and we benefitted from it enormously.
Somehow,
it is easier to harness the spirit of the community within the life of the
church when the local shop will keep a key for the kirk or the village hall
waives its fee for work with children. Unions with bigger charges should build
into the ‘Basis of Union’ provision for dedicated rural ministry and safeguard
the heart of the Kirk.
Comments
Post a Comment