16 August 2024

In a recent issue of the Church Times, it was reported that Lutheran Churches are to discourage the use of the filioque clause in their version of the Nicene Creed. When the Creed was first approved by the Council of Nicaea in 325 it included the statement that the Holy Spirit   ‘proceeds from the Father’.

In seventh century Spain, ‘and the Son’ was added to this to read that the Holy Spirit ‘proceeds from the Father and the Son’. It was a local addition and not approved by an Ecumenical Council of the Church. The Pope resisted it until 1030 when it became embedded into Latin Christendom.

According to RW Southern, in 1050 Pope Leo IX ‘defended the orthodoxy of both statements with an illustration: a fruit (he said) may be said to come from the trunk of a tree, or from the branch, or from the trunk through the branch; so the Spirit may be said to come from the Father, or from the Son, or from the Father through the Son.’

It was one significant contributing factor to the Great Schism between the Eastern and the Western Church in 1054. Now the Lutherans are wanting to return to the original form of the Creed before the 1700th anniversary next year. The desire for unity is to be commended for it holds the promise of a more effective witness to the world.

In St. John’s Gospel, Jesus tries to comfort his disciples in his farewell discourse when he says, ‘The Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you everything and remind you of all that I  have said to you.’ The absence created by his ascension will be filled with the Spirit who will make things clear.

There is such an intimacy between the Father and the Son. The one is incarnate in the other. The Spirit is sent by the Father in the name of Jesus. So he has something to do with its sending too. But nothing is lost by the removal of ‘and the Son’ from the creed and much is gained. It may lead to unity and the conversion of the world!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog