16 August 2024
In
a recent issue of the Church Times, it was reported that Lutheran Churches are
to discourage the use of the filioque clause
in their version of the Nicene Creed. When the Creed was first approved by the
Council of Nicaea in 325 it included the statement that the Holy Spirit ‘proceeds from the Father’.
In
seventh century Spain, ‘and the Son’ was added to this to read that the Holy
Spirit ‘proceeds from the Father and the Son’. It was a local addition and not
approved by an Ecumenical Council of the Church. The Pope resisted it until
1030 when it became embedded into Latin Christendom.
According
to RW Southern, in 1050 Pope Leo IX ‘defended the orthodoxy of both statements
with an illustration: a fruit (he said) may be said to come from the trunk of a
tree, or from the branch, or from the trunk through the branch; so the Spirit
may be said to come from the Father, or from the Son, or from the Father
through the Son.’
It
was one significant contributing factor to the Great Schism between the Eastern
and the Western Church in 1054. Now the Lutherans are wanting to return to the original
form of the Creed before the 1700th anniversary next year. The
desire for unity is to be commended for it holds the promise of a more
effective witness to the world.
In
St. John’s Gospel, Jesus tries to comfort his disciples in his farewell
discourse when he says, ‘The Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will
send in my name, will teach you everything and remind you of all that I have said to you.’ The absence created by his
ascension will be filled with the Spirit who will make things clear.
There
is such an intimacy between the Father and the Son. The one is incarnate in the
other. The Spirit is sent by the Father in the name of Jesus. So he has
something to do with its sending too. But nothing is lost by the removal of ‘and
the Son’ from the creed and much is gained. It may lead to unity and the
conversion of the world!
Comments
Post a Comment