17 November 2025
In
my last charge, we made a number of films about different aspects of parish and
Presbytery life. In these films, people were interviewed. In order not to
manipulate what people said, I instructed the interviewer and photographer to
ask everyone exactly the same questions.
This
meant that when the inevitable splicing took place and bits of interviews were
joined together, the various comments used were consistent with the questions asked. I discovered that it was
very easy to cut and divide and create misinformation.
The
splicing of Donald Trump’s speech prior to the riots on Capitol Hill which were
made by the BBC Panorama crew has caused much controversy. Clearly, the lack of
context has created the impression that Trump was inciting the crowd to attack
the Capitol.
The
BBC has acknowledged its error and made its apology. Who knows whether or not
this will be sufficient to avert a court case in which Trump carries out his
threat to sue the BBC for five billion dollars. Certain questions remain
unanswered.
The
spliced speech may have lacked integrity but it remains unclear whether or not
Trump was guilty of encouraging his supporters to riot. Equally well, it is
surprising that this splicing and dicing should have gone unnoticed for so many years.
The
desire of the President to damage the
world’s most trusted news agency whilst upholding the special relationship with the
United Kingdom and seeking peace in the world’s most complex troubled spots in
which fake news is rife is bizarre. The
apology has been given. Its acceptance is due. Time to move on together and
keep the peace.
Comments
Post a Comment